Motivation Theory: Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Motivation Theory: Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs
Contribution of “Maslow’s Hierarchy
of Needs Theory” to Employee Motivation
Added
to the fact, that it is the responsibility of line managers to bring the best
out of the employees in order to achieve the Organizational goals; it is only
capable by them to accomplish (Ovidiu, 2013). To achieve goals, managers should
apply the art of management by encouraging the exact Interest of the Individual
which is known as Motivation (Mahalakshmi & Franklin, 2015). Motivation
theories which were brought in and developed by many scholars, have been
assisting many practicing managers to date. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs is one
such initial theory proposed by a psychologist named Abraham Maslow, in 1943 (Joko
& Sri, 2017).
Need,
is the basic concept that keeps the world actively exist (John, 1970) and with
no doubt this has been the principal for Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory. A
need of specific element can be satisfied at any cost, regardless of the nature;
but the need of a need, an Individual wants to satisfy never ends. MacGregor
(2003) simply phrased it up as “Man is a wanting Animal”.
“A
poor person isn’t the one who has little, but who needs a lot” said Seneca, a
Roman philosopher. Identifying that the thirst of need is a never ending chase,
Maslow tiered up five layers of needs in a hierarchical order of Importance,
according to his observation (Wong & Low, 2018). Which are psychological
needs, safety needs, social needs, self-esteem needs & self-actualization
needs (Wong & Low, 2018). Maslow explains that an individual can bring a
positive behavioral change in his actions, if the right need drives him; which is
because every personal is a fusion of strengths and needs, says Ovidiu (2013). This
theory has contributed tremendously for organizations & managers in
achieving goals effectively while guiding as a basic, but an implied theory
enduring over the decades regardless of the criticism raised. (Munyaradzi et al, 2016).
The
theory mainly confronts that the need should be satisfied from the lowest to
highest of which the employee is exactly yearning (Sule, 2015). The theory
further explains that when one need is satisfied, it no longer Influence the
employee as he would start craving for the need in next level, which would
still stimulate and reinforce employee to perform effectively towards achieving
goal (Adiele & Abraham, 2012).
Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs (McLeod, 2020)
The
above diagram shows how Maslow has arranged, levels of need on the basic view
of its’ Importance.
Psychological Needs:
This need in the bottom of the triangle is the most powerful, basic urgent
need, which is required biologically. This Includes food, water, air, shelter
& clothing. It is simply understood that a starving personal would not be
motivated by safety or esteem measures, he would only be driven by food (Mohammed
et al, 2014). In work life
applications this basic need is determined by the financial means, which is the
wage (Avneet, 2013).
Safety Needs: The
desire of an Individual to feel free of danger and to be secured. This
satisfaction of need enables an employee to work against the negativity of fear
& stress with a peaceful, calm mind which can bring in Innovative &
effective ideas to the organization. This need arises to sustain the level of the
employee where he can meet his basic need without interruption (Lynn et al, 2016). In work life application
this need is determined by some measures like Job security and a well-planned
benefit package consisting of employee welfare, medical benefits &
Insurance (Joko & Sri, 2017).
Love & Belonging (Social)
Needs: This is a need for acceptance with love and care to
sense the belongingness. This develops the relationships among people to share
calm working environment, while improving team spirit (Lynn et al, 2016). This will boost employee
to report to work, contribute and emerge as an effective team enabling synergy
effect. Grouping with suitable team members, arranging office excursion,
arranging participative training would encourage to satisfy this need.
Self - Esteem Needs: Every
Individual internally would want to know what he is capable of, this need gives
the answer. An employee recognized for his efforts would try to bring out more
of his capabilities in order to gain respect, appreciation, and recognition in
working space while strengthening his skills internally (Mohammed et al, 2014). This gives a feel of
superiority to the employee, that he is noticed and valued for his efforts.
Workplace can implement effective rewarding schemes and small staff appreciation
events on monthly basis to improve productivity & innovative ideas (Jerome et al, 2013).
Self - Actualization Needs: This
need is a desire of an Individual to realize their full potential (Lynn et al, 2016). This is the ultimate need
which arises after being satisfied with all other lower tiers of need. Here an
employee would contribute, while enhancing himself to self-fulfillment by
taking over any challenges to represent himself as a valuable asset to the organization
(Avneet, 2013).
“Humans
are dynamic & multidimensional being” says Joko & Sri (2017). When it
comes to complying with reality, the force which drives the employee should be
understood by the managers with the extent of the depth towards need and employees
engagement levels. A clear understanding of above would enable the management
to design a best fitting culture. As Rahman & Nurullah (2014) explains a
culture which is built unique with special attention of cultivating motivated
employees will result more beyond applying Maslow’s motivation theory. Tezcan,
Sibel & Emine (2017) further highlights that a culture specific Maslow’s
theory would enhance the productivity, and result “Sustainable Competitive
Advantage” to the Organization.
As
a personnel working for Tea plantation sector, I see many employees form basic
laborers to high ranked corporate personnel’s. Their set of needs vary from one
another. Our organization is contributing to meet their needs varying in line,
with the personnel’s position held. Psychology needs are met by providing free
breakfast & lunch to all basic workers and special kits for tea pluckers along
with an appropriate and flexible infrastructure to work with a suitable wage
scheme aligning with the industrial benchmark. Safety needs are met by providing
insurance, medical benefits and a simple yet satisfying employee welfare policy
along with health & safety practices within the premises providing a
workable friendly environment. Our organization is also engaged in pairing up
with a child day care unit, free of charge to specially satisfy the female
employees working in bottom line to remove their stress out of mind. Also our organization
contributes to social needs by conducting many active training sessions, yearly
staff excursion and social events. Annual bonuses, feasible appraisals, small but
great events & awards that recognize best employee and Idea storming sessions
are keeping the self-esteem needs in place. Also some personnel’s holding high
positions are provided with luxury vehicles of which expenses are borne by the
organization. Self-actualization needs are met with project leaderships given
with full authority to imply ideas and taking responsibilities accordingly.
“If
I had nine hours to chop down a tree, I’d spend the first six sharpening my
axe” said Abraham Lincoln. Correspondingly a perfect application of Maslow’s
Hierarchy of Needs with an appropriate culture enables increased productivity
and effective workforce, reduced trained labor turnover which eventually
increases employee savings, leading to Sustainable competitive advantage taking
the organization towards its Vision”.
References
·
Adiele,
E.E. & Abraham, N.M. (2012) Achievement of Abraham Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy
Theory among Teachers: Implications for Human Resource Management in The
Secondary School System in Rivers State. Journal
of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), pp. 140 – 144.
·
Avneet, K. (2013) Maslow’s Need Hierarchy Theory:
Applications and Criticisms. Global Journal of Management and Business
Studies, 3(10), pp. 1061 –
1064.
·
Jerome,
N., Helen, D., Susan, T. and Agnes, T. (2013) Do Motivation Drive Employee’S Performance in Public Sector Organization?
European Journal of Business and
Management, 5(17), pp. 92 – 98.
·
John,
L. (1970) The Theory That The World Exists Because It Should. American Philosophical Quarterly, 7(4),
pp. 286 – 298.
·
Juko, S. &
Sri,W.M. (2017) Motivation Engineering to Employee by Employees Abraham Maslow
Theory. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(1), pp. 86 – 92.
·
Lynn, D.V.,
Antonio, B., Brenton, B., Marc, C. and Bahaudin, G.
M. (2016) Employee Motivation based on the Hierarchy of Needs, Expectancy and
the Two-Factor Theories Applied with Higher Education Employees. International Journal of Advances in
Management, Economics and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), pp. 20 – 32.
·
MacGregor, D.
(2003) The Sociology of Organizations.
1st ed. California, Sage Publications, pp.108 – 115.
·
Mahalakshmi, A. & Franklin, S. J. (2015) A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATIONAL FACTOR
ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TEA PLANTATION
INDUSTRIES OF ANAMALLAIS, COIMBATORE, DISTRICT. International
Journal in Management and Social Science, 3(1), pp. 59 – 64.
· McLeod, S. A. (2020) Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychology [Online].Available at:<https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html>.[Accessed on 20th April 2020].
·
Mohammed,
F.H., Mohammed, A.H. and Shamimul, I. (2014) Motivational Theories – A Critical Analysis. ASA University
Review, 8(1), pp. 61 – 68.
·
Munyaradzi, M., Tapuwa, R. M., Mirjam, V.R.
and Gertjan V.S. (2016) Maslow’s Theory of Human Motivation and its Deep Roots
in Individualism Interrogating Maslow’s Applicability in Africa [Online].Available at:
<researchgate.net/publication/302516151_Maslow's_Theory_of_
Human_Motivation_and_its_Deep_Roots_in_Individualism_Interrogating_Maslow's_Applicability_in_Africa
> .[Accessed on 19th April 2020].
·
Ovidiu, I. D.
(2013) Employee motivation and organizational performance. Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research, 5(1), pp. 53 – 60.
·
Rahman, H.
& Nurullah, S. M. (2014) MOTIVATIONAL NEED HIERARCHY OF EMPLOYEES IN
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COMMERCIAL BANKS. CENTRAL EUROPEAN BUSINESS REVIEW, 3(2), pp. 44 – 53.
·
Sule, M. (2015) An Assessment of the Impact of
Motivation and Job Satisfaction on Employee Productivity in an Organization. Research
on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(20), pp. 24 – 30.
·
Tezcan, H. U.,
Sibel, A. and Emine, G. (2017) MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS IN 21ST CENTURY: THE
EXAMINATION OF VOCATIONAL DIFFERENCES [Online].Available at: <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321267309_MASLOW'S_HIERARCHY_OF_NEEDS_IN_21ST_CENTURY_THE_EXAMINATION_OF_VOCATIONAL_DIFFERENCES > .[Accessed on 21st April
2020].
·
Wong, P.T. &
Low, A. (2018) Improving Workplace Productivity: Applications of Maslow’s Need
Theory and Locke’s Goal-Setting. Psychology
& Psychological Research International, 3(8), pp. 01 – 05.
Maslow’s pyramid of human needs, proposed in 1943, has been one of the most cognitively contagious ideas in the behavioral sciences. Anticipating later evolutionary views of human motivation and cognition, Maslow viewed human motives as based in innate and universal predispositions. Almost 70 years have passed since Abraham Maslow’s classic 1943 Psychological Review paper proposing a hierarchical approach to human motivation. Maslow’s model had an immense influence on the field of psychology, including the subfields of personality, social psychology, psychopathology, developmental psychology, and organizational behavior, and it continues to be cited widely in textbooks (Douglas, Vladas, Steven, Mark 2011)
ReplyDeleteYes, Agreed Uditha. The theory is widely known and practiced beyond criticisms due to its basic but yet a clear understanding on the human behaviors and attitudes towards their needs, based on a hierarchical alignment of importance. Joko &Wiwoho (2017) states that the theory has led a clear path to managers in understanding the need of any employee from the organizational hierarchy, which could influence & drive their behaviors towards Organizational goals.
DeleteAccording to instrumentality theory states in effect that rewards and punishments are the best instruments with which to shape behaviour. It assumes that people will be motivated to work if rewards and penalties are tied directly to their performance; thus the awards are contingent upon effective performance Armstrong, (2014).
ReplyDeleteAgreed on your view Nadee, as mentioned rewards can be the best way of motivating employees. Faizul, Aminul & Islam (2014) explains that Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory has given a clear guidelines on which reward (Need) would stimulate individual performances as they differ person to person. The theory also proposes that the correct reward driver should be decided with the consideration of what motivates an employee along with what he already has.
DeleteThere are also many criticisms that the need-based theories, in particular Maslow's need theory hierarchy, are inadequate in terms of explaining work-life behaviors (Yang, 2003; jex, 2008). In a study carried out in the USA by Wofford (1971), it was found that a high degree of motivation was a more effective motivator for employees who were unable to meet their low-level needs.
ReplyDeleteAgreed that there are many criticisms raised upon the theory, as no theory is exception for arguments. But yet, the theory has been providing an outline to the managers on the motivational strategies till date due to its simplicity and hierarchical arrangement which has been proved to be an honest arrangement that still complies even after being at the age of more than half a century (Avneet, 2013)
DeleteI agreed with your view and also According to Smith & Cronje (1992), the way Maslow’s theory is explained relies on the fact that people want to increase what they want to achieve in life and their needs are prioritized according to their importance (Gambrel, 2003). Deriving from the hierarchy of needs by Maslow, content theories of job satisfaction revolve around employees’ needs and the factors that bring them a reasonable degree of satisfaction (Saif, et.al, 2012).
ReplyDelete